My runner-up prize. I've named him gReg the R jester. He judges me on my R scripts. Look at that smug face, mocking me. |
The range of questions (in each of the formats) was inspiring, ranging from simple "how long have you been a researcher?" or "what's your thesis about?", to the more difficult "What part of your research can improve mental health to make people happier?" or "what do you hope to achieve with your research?". The latter questions took some time for me to consider, and I do feel like some required a much more in-depth response. Sadly, in a chat room, writing a long post to fully address all angles of a question is somewhat challenging.
The whole event was an eye-opening experience, and now that I have had some time to process what started as 'just' a public engagement exercise for me. Now, I am fully convinced in the importance of these events as an additional avenue to interact with the next generation of researchers. They deserve to know more about what research and being a researcher entails. Also, for those of them considering university and research more broadly, they should know what they might be getting themselves in for.
"Umm, my name is Sam and I, er, try to do science..." |
An example; "what is the best thing about being a researcher?". The answers cover so many aspects that make working in research an awesome thing to have as a career. But, by the nature of the question itself, it completely misses what are the bad things about being a researcher.
So, are we giving potential future researchers an accurate picture of research life? I don't think so.
Watch this space for blog posts and maybe a podcast or two (if I can figure out recording one and don't hate my voice too much). Feel free to comment with questions you wish you had an answer to before heading into research or University. Also, post them to my twitter so we can discuss them more broadly!
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteInteresting idea about the accuracy of the picture portrayed. Throws up questions for me: Do young people expect only the upsides? Surely that's all they are given by any career advisor? Would encouraging researchers to talk about the downsides give an impression that research is worse than it is because you're the only ones talking about the downside? Would we get accused of doing down science?
I'll raise the idea of including a profile question "Worst part of my job?" in our November I'm a Scientist event...
Shane
Thanks for the comment Shane! definitely food for thought.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if the upsides are all that are expected, there were a few questions about difficulties, but the majority were on the positive side. I think that we should be encouraging an honest picture as much as possible. I'm a Researcher helps with this in the first instance with the live chats and live final, it helps the researchers come across as people doing research, rather than an idealised characture of a perfect researcher.
We can talk about the down sides without being overly negative. For instance, rather than "what is the worst part of my job?", how about, "what things about science or research can be improved?" or "what is one thing that you find difficult about the job?". These questions still promote a more complete and honest picture of research life, but without being too negative.
Definitely food for thought, I'll keep this in mind for my next blog / podcast :)
Sam